The UN and the Occult Agenda
The lecture is entitled ‘The UN and the Occult Agenda’. Along the way we learn many fascinating things including the fact that Arthur Balfour (instrumental in both the creation of the League of Nations and the State of Israel) initiated a group called ‘The Synthetic Society’ whose goal was to create a ‘one world religion’. However a far more interesting figure was former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations, Robert Muller. Ominously he is quoted, by Doug L. Kinman in the ‘World’s Last Dictator, as saying:
“We must move as quickly as possible to a one-world government; a one-world religion; under a one-world leader.”
Former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev is intimately linked with the UN, the New Age and the New World Order agenda. In a statement he made in 1987 we get an idea of the political dimension of this world government:
“We are moving toward a New World Order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.”
The vehicle he uses to promote his vision of a communist New World Order is his Gorbachev Foundation. Its founder and President Jim Garrison is quoted by Dennis Laurence Cuddy in ‘Ruling Elite Working Towards World Govt.,’ p.4. as saying:
“We are going to end up with world government. It’s inevitable… There’s going to be conflict, coercion and consensus. That’s all part of what will be required as we give birth to the global civilisation.”
We also learn, from Muller, of the strong influence of the ‘father of the New Age movement’ and Catholic Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin:
“Teilhard had always viewed the United Nations as the progressive institutional embodiment of his philosophy”.
Chardin’s philosophy turns out to remarkably similar to the ‘we are all gods’, Luciferian, ‘oneness’ so prevalent amongst New Agers and conspiracy researchers such as David Icke. One thing’s for sure, we can see from the following statement that he’s not a true, Bible believing, Christian:
“…a general convergence of religions upon a universal Christ who satisfies them all….seems to me the only possible conversion of the world, and the only form in which a religion of the future can be conceived.”
Here we see evidence of the widespread ‘ecumenical’ drive for a ‘one world’ religion. A religion that will have its roots in the ‘New Age’ philosophy. The ‘Christ’ he refers is not the Jesus Christ of the Bible. The identity of the ‘Christ’ is not yet known but some have speculated (for good reason) that it could well be the New Age ‘Christ’ (or anti-Christ) Maitreya as prophesied by Benjamin Creme of Share International. On its website we read that:
“Maitreya and his group of spiritual co-workers have designed a plan that is brilliant in its simplicity and insight. They visualise a world organisation, administered by the United Nations, which will completely restructure our economic systems.”
It should be remembered that the elite cabal behind the New World Oder can quite easily stop all the evil they’ve created to make seem their ‘christ’, when he appears, seem all powerful and thus credible.
Robert Muller was involved in many things not the least of which was the Robert Muller School. He was known as the ‘father of global education’ and developed the ‘World Core Curriculum’ which, according to New Man Magazine, 1995, seeks to:
“…steer our children towards global citizenship, earth-centred beliefs, socialist values and collective mindset which is becoming a requirement for the 21st century workforce.”
The curriculum plays an ever more important part in the global educational policies of the UN. On page 13 we read that:
“A world core curriculum might seem utopian today. By the end of the year 2000 it will be a down-to-earth, daily reality in all the schools of the world.”
Here we can see how the children of the world are to be brainwashed into becoming willing members of the New World Order. It will doubtless be presented in harmless sounding, even desirable terms, such as unity, tolerance and diversity, but the reality will be anything but. In the preface to the curriculum we also learn that:
“The underlying philosophy upon which the Robert Muller School is based will be found in the teachings set forth in the books of Alice A. Bailey ….”
So it seems the ‘underlying philosophy’ of this ‘World Core Curriculum’ will be the Theosophic Luciferianism of Alice A. Bailey. Bailey, along with her 32nd degree freemason husband Foster, created the Lucifer publishing company. It later changed into the Lucis Trust that still to this day prints and disseminates UN material. She claimed to have a Tibetan ‘teacher’ or ‘ascended master of wisdom’ that spoke to her from the spirit world. His name was Djwal Kuhl and he, allegedly, dictated many of her books and pamphlets while she was under his influence. This would include the books recommended by Muller.
She was also the third head of the Theosophical Society which was founded by the ‘mother of the New Age movement’ Helena Blavatsky. Blavatsky is quoted in her book ‘The Secret Doctrine’ as saying:
“Lucifer represents.. Life.. Thought.. Progress.. Civilisation.. Liberty.. Independence.. Lucifer is the Logos..the Serpent, the Saviour.”
“The Celestial Virgin which thus becomes the Mother of Gods and Devils at one and the same time; for she is the ever-loving beneficent Deity…but in antiquity and reality Lucifer or Luciferius is the name. Lucifer is divine and terrestrial Light, ‘the Holy Ghost’ and ‘Satan’ at one and the same time.”
“It is Satan who is God of our planet and the only God.”
The Lucis Trust is ‘recognised by the United Nations as a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO), and is represented at [its] regular briefing sessions.’ We can only speculate as to how Blavatsky and Bailey came to these conclusions but it is more than a little concerning that the education policy of the UN is heavily influenced by those who worship Lucifer and Satan. Doubtless both Blavatsky and Bailey would be only too happy to explain how Lucifer was really the ‘good guy’. Yet one look at the lies, deceit and manipulation (and more besides) of those involved in the agenda tells you all you need to know. In contrast, although you may not necessarily agree with ordinary Bible believing Christians (as distinct from the hierarchy of the Catholic church for example) none of them are involved in a plot to enslave the populations of the world in a Satanic New World Order.
The former director of the World Health Organisation, Dr. Brook Chisolm gave us some idea of what the education policy of the UN would be trying to achieve. In the Christian World Report (March 1991, Vol. 3, No. 3) he stated:
“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas…”
In that short sentence we can see why there’s such a drive amongst many of the New World Order researchers, such as David Icke and those in the New Age movement to get us to ‘unite’ or ‘become one consciousness’. It’s the elite’s desire to remove any sense of individualism from our minds. We can also see why mass immigration has suddenly become so widespread in the Western world. It’s a cynical and calculated attempt by the elites to destroy national patriotism.
The main way they are attempting to ‘remove religious dogmas’ is through the ecumenical movement’s drive to unite the world’s religions. It’s very easy to be drawn into the idea that we must ‘unite’ to both defeat the New World Order or to settle religious disagreements. The reality is that what may seem like an effort to reduce religious conflict is actually an attempt to get mankind to collectively worship Lucifer.
Another United Nations NGO is the ‘Temple of Understanding’. In the 1994 newsletter of an organisation called World Goodwill (one of the many off-shoots of the Lucis Trust), it stated that:
“…the Temple of Understanding has as one of its goals the creation of ‘a spiritual United Nations’ [and] work[s] to promote understanding between religions on the basis of the oneness of the human family….it is based at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine [in New York]”.
This Cathedral of St. John the Divine was funded by elites such as JP Morgan as well as the Grand Master of the Masons of the state of New York. It is supposed to be Christian but has been described as ‘neo pagan’ and ‘borderline Satanic’ and seems to have a key role in the creation of a one world religion.
World Goodwill, also a United Nations NGO, is clearly a cog in the New World Order machine. On page 5 of a document entitled, ‘The United Nations: Entering the Global Age’ we read:
“The UN, through its international conference and special sessions, has called the world’s attention to.. the need for a new international economic order… the work of the UN goes forward, steadily building the foundation for a New World Order.”
World Goodwill has a stated aim which is:
“… to cooperate in the world of preparation for the return of the Christ.”
As we’ve seen before, this is very definitely not Jesus Christ. Bailey worships Lucifer and it is he/she/it that she is preparing for. In ‘The Reappearance of the Christ’, p.15, she says:
“The major effect of his appearance will surely be to demonstrate in every land the effects of a spirit of inclusiveness – an inclusiveness which will be channeled or expressed through him. All who seek right human relations will be gathered automatically to him, whether they are in one of the great religions or not; all who see no true or basic difference between religion and religion or between man and man or nation and nation will rally around him; those who embody the spirit of exclusiveness and separateness will stand automatically and equally revealed and all men will know them for what they are.”
So anyone who doesn’t go along with the agenda, who doesn’t agree that there is ‘no basic difference between the religions’ or even between men will be ‘revealed’. They will probably be ‘revealed’ as those who are resisting the ‘consciousness shift’ into ‘oneness’ and who are holding back the evolution of mankind. As we’ve already seen from New Ager Barbara Marx Hubbard, the fate of anyone expressing ‘exclusiveness and separateness’ (unique individuality) may not be a good one. In her book, ‘the Book of Co-Creation’, she writes:
“Out of the full spectrum of the human personality, one-fourth is elected to transcend and one-fourth are destructive, defective seeds. In the past they were permitted to die a natural death. Now, as we approach the quantum shift from the creature-human to the co-creative human – the human who is an inheritor of god-like powers – the destructive one-fourth must be eliminated from the social body. Fortunately, you are not responsible for this act. We are. We are in charge of God’s selection process for planet Earth. He selects – we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death.”
Alice Bailey says a similar thing in ‘Education in the New Age’:
“Let us never forget … that when a (life) form proves inadequate, or too diseased, or too crippled … it is–from the point of view of the hierarchy– no disaster when that form has to go…. Death is not a disaster to be feared; the Work of the destroyer is not really cruel or undesirable…. Therefore, there is much destruction permitted by the Custodians of the Plan and much evil turned into good.”
Yet another Lucis Trust off-shoot is the New Group of World Servers who are ‘servers’ of the ‘Great Plan’ and who ‘seek to aid the great ones’. The ‘great ones’ are the ‘invisible hierarchy’ or ‘ascended masters’ who, it is claimed, have guided mankind through the ages as ‘the invisible government of the planet’. Such luminaries as Bono and Michael Moore are members of the Group.
More evidence of the ‘spiritual’ nature of the UN can be found in its meditation room. Texe Marrs, in ‘Mystery Mark of the New Age’, p. 102, noted that:
“The Meditation Room is…shaped as a pyramid without the capstone. Inside the room is dimly lit, but coming from the ceiling is a narrow but concentrated pinpoint beam of light which radiates down to a bleak stone alter. On the wall straight ahead is a breathtaking, modernistic mural that is dynamically endowed with occult symbolism, containing twenty seven triangles in various configurations, a mixture of black and white and coloured background and a snakelike vertical line. At the centre is the all seeing eye, which grips the millions of annual U.N. visitors with its stark, beckoning image of suspicion and omnipresence”.
Walter Veith’s lecture also shows how the UN has developed a World Economic Development Strategy; the Food and Agriculture Organisation has a World Food Plan 2000; the World Health Organisation has a World Health Plan 2000; UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) has a World Literacy Plan 2000; the ILO (International Labor Organisation) has a World Employment Plan 2000 and the U.N. Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO) has a World Industry Plan 2000. We also learn that U.N. demographers have provided us with population projections for the next hundred years and the World Meteorological Organisation tries to forecast our climate for the next several hundred years. In short, this is an embryonic World Government that is planning to control every detail of our whole lives.
Looking at just one of the organisations listed above, UNESCO, we find its constitution was written by Archibald Macleish, a member of the same, occult secret society, Skull and Bones as both President Bush’s. Scott Donaldson wrote a biography of Macleish where he stated that “[he] strongly advocated One Worldism…”
UNESCO was founded in 1945, as the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation and since then has led the drive to create a standardised one world culture in preparation for the proposed World Government. As we saw earlier the main vehicle for this is through the education (indoctrination) system.
Another of its founding members was Julian Huxley, brother of writer Aldous. In 1948 Huxley wrote:
“In its education program (UNESCO) can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarise all people with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organisation… Political unification in some sort of world government will be required.”
He further expressed his vision in ‘UNESCO: Its Purposes and Its Philosophy”, when he wrote:
“The task before UNESCO… is to help the emergence of a single world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas, and with its own broad purposes.”
The Huxley’s were members of the British aristocratic ‘elite’ and stanch advocates of eugenics. Thomas, the grandfather of Julian and Aldous, was known as ‘Darwin’s Bulldog’, for his advocacy of the Darwinian Theory. Julian himself was President of the British Eugenics Society. In 1941 he wrote:
“The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore…they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilisation.”
Concern about over-population and discussing benign solutions is not a problem but suggesting people should have their access to health care restricted is nothing short of wicked.
Huxley’s views were typical of the controlling ‘elite’ and those views are perfectly expressed in the agenda of UNESCO. Its aims are to create a collectivist (communitarian) world culture where the primary purpose of the masses is to serve and be reliant upon the state. Again, this is why the ‘unity’ and ‘one consciousness’ of New Agers and researchers such as David Icke are so important to the agenda. All individualism and free thought must be eradicated as they are an obstacle to it. Huxley considered how this should be done in his book:
“Taking the techniques of persuasion and information and true propaganda that we have learnt to apply nationally in war, and deliberately bending them to the international tasks of peace, if necessary utilising them, as Lenin envisaged, to ‘overcome the resistance of millions’ to desirable change.”
‘Change’, the buzzword of American Presidential and British Prime Ministerial candidates alike. As you can see those elites at work in the UN and in particular UNESCO are actively attempting (and in many cases succeeding) to change the culture, attitudes and values in order to ‘persuade’ people to accept the New World Order. The aims and principles of organisations such as these seem deceptively good and even desirable if taken at face value. Look beneath the surface though and it’s quite clear there is a hidden agenda that is quite the opposite. The creation of a World Government requires a simultaneous creation of a ‘global’ culture and destruction of the old one. Internationalism and globalism must be promoted at every opportunity and at the same time nations, their sovereignty and their people must be denigrated and if not destroyed, then changed beyond recognition.
We’ve already seen from our look at Robert Muller that the UN places great stock in the education (indoctrination and brainwashing) of children. John A. Stormer, in his book ‘None Dare Call It Treason’, p.112 writes:
“Under Huxley’s guidance, the United Nations prepared a guidebook for teachers. This guidebook reminds them that the destruction of a child’s love of country and patriotism is the first step in educating that child for world citizenship”.
In a section entitled ‘In the Classroom with Children Under Thirteen Years of Age’, it says:
“Before the child enters school his mind has already been profoundly marked and often injuriously, by earlier influences… first gained, however dimly, in the home.”
On page 8, it continues in a similar theme with:
“The kindergarden or infant school has a significant part to play in the child’s education. Not only can it correct many of the errors of home training but it can also prepare the child for membership, at about age seven, in a group of his own age and habits – the first of many such social identifications that he must achieve on his way to membership in the world society.”
As you can see, the state (UNESCO) knows best. Then on page 58 it says:
“As we have pointed out, it is frequently the family that infects the child with extreme nationalism. The school should therefore use the means described earlier to combat family attitudes.”
For ‘extreme’ nationalism read any sort of patriotic or nationalist feeling whatsoever. On page 11 of volume V it sets out the following guidelines:
“In our view, history and geography should be taught at this age as universal history and geography… The study of history…raises problems of values which are better postponed until the nationalist prejudices which at present surround the teaching of history.”
Yet another NGO recognised by the UN and represented at their regular briefing sessions, is the Findhorn Foundation. One of their early directors was David Spangler. In his book ‘Reflections of the Christ’, p43-44 we read the following:
“The true light of Lucifer cannot be seen through sorrow, through darkness, through rejection. The true light of this great being can only be recognised when one’s own eyes can see with the light of the Christ, the light of the inner sun. Lucifer works within each of us to bring us to wholeness, and as we move into a New Age, which is the age of man’s wholeness, each of us in same way is brought to that point which I term the Luciferic initiation, the particular doorway through which the individual must pass if he is to come ‘fully’ into the presence of his light and his wholeness…Lucifer comes to give us the final gift of wholeness.”
“Lucifer prepares man in all ways for experience of Christ-hood and the Christ prepares man for the experience of God. But the light that reveals to us the presence of the Christ, the light that reveals to us the path to the Christ comes from Lucifer. He is the light giver. He is aptly named the Morning Star (note, this is the name of a daily, communist newspaper printed in the UK) because it is his light that heralds for man the dawn of a greater consciousness. He is present when that dawn is realised. He stands no longer as the tester or tempter but as the great initiator, the one who hands the soul over to the Christ and from the Christ on into ever greater realms.”
Again, this is most definitely not Jesus Christ that he’s referring to. On page 73 of his book he states:
“We can take all the scriptures and all the teachings and all the tablets and all the laws, and all the marshmallows and have a jolly good bonfire and marshmallow roast, because that is all they are worth.”
David Spangler is yet another of these ‘New Agers’ who has had experiences with ‘non physical entities’. It seems obvious that people such as Spangler have assumed that these entities can only mean well. Yet we see an uncanny similarity between the agenda and aims of the ‘entities’ and those who will do absolutely anything in pursuit of the New World Order. The ‘entities’ are invariably anti-Christian and pro-one consciousness, a concept that is pursued in the form of a totalitarian world government and a New Age one world religion. Make no mistake a world religion is certainly part of the plan. At a meeting of the parliament of world religions, Robert Muller ominously declared:
“Do not worry if not all religions will join the United Religions organisation. Many nations did not join the UN at its beginning, but later regretted it and made every effort to join. It was the same with the European community and it will be the case with the world’s religions because whoever stays out or aloof will sooner or later regret it.”
There we are, join or ‘regret’ it. To get an idea of what this world religion will teach we can turn to a World Goodwill publication entitled ‘The Problems of Humanity: The Building of Right Human Relations, Study Six – The Problems of the Churches, pp. 10-11, 34:
“The churches and the world religions should indicate the unity within all facets of truth which will provide a universal platform, one to which all men everywhere could give allegiance. Such a platform should include… the truth that… all men are divine… that evolution governs the growth of the human being [and] the fact of immortality and of eternal persistence (reincarnation), arising from man’s essential divinity.”
A Christian would say that only Jesus is divine and that God created man not ‘evolution’. I can only say that until recently I would have probably agreed that evolution was the most likely explanation for the creation and development of man. I’d assumed the evidence was overwhelming in favour of it and that the idea of any sort of creation was provable nonsense. That was until I was exposed to some of the arguments in favour of creation, againcourtesy of Walter Veith. I certainly recommend watching this series if only for a fascinating and alternative point of view. Veith provides the sort of information that is are very hard to come by in these days, where evolution is presented as given absolute fact.
As for the ‘divinity’ of man, this is just another way of expressing the notion that we are all gods. As we saw in the earlier Teilhard de Chardin post, this is the pantheistic idea that is “a favourite doctrine of collectivists, because it offers a concept of man which, on religious grounds, subordinates the individual to the collective.”
In a 1985 World Goodwill flyer we again hear of the coming world teacher who they say “… will be mainly concerned, not with the result of past error and inadequacy, but with the requirements of a New World Order and with the reorganisation of the social structures.” In other words we can expect ‘change’. A ‘change’ that will likely see the destruction of the middle classes and the creation of a two tiered society. The controllers and the controlled.
Bailey talks about this new world religion and the coming ‘christ’ on page 152 of ‘Destiny of the Nations’:
“Thus the expressed aims and efforts of the United Nations will be eventually brought to fruition and a new church of God, gathered out of all religions and spiritual groups, will unitedly bring to an end the great heresy of separateness. Love, unity, and the Risen Christ will be present, and He will demonstrate to us the perfect life.”
I’m sure this will prove extremely deceptive to many. Whether or not we should be looking to the UN to help ‘create’ a new religion is a moot point to say the least. Whatever your thoughts on this a few things should be remembered. The religious divisions that are said to warrant this ‘uniting’ have been either manufactured or exploited and made much worse by the actions of the global elite. We live in a time of intentionally created spiritual deception and confusion as this same elite cabal attempt to change from one system of control to another.
There’s a big difference between groups and individuals working together and us all ‘becoming one consciousness’. What is needed is not some false unity in order for the evils of the world to stop. It would only be achieved through lies and deception and as we’ve already seen from Barbara Marx Hubbard’s quote, at the expense of those who do not co-operate with the agenda.
Instead, the best hope for everyone on the planet must surely be the removal of the controlling cabal and their minions and an end put to their plans for global domination. Only then is there a chance that the spiritual deceptions they’ve promoted and the confusion and division they’ve created will be exposed. That would then leave each of us to reach our own personal spiritual conclusions. A process made easier by much that has undoubtedly been suppressed and kept from us, being made manifest.
Similarly much of the claimed justification for increasing globalisation and world governance is due to the manipulations of the elite powers. Sovereign free nations, co-operating together on issues that require it, has to be preferable to a world government controlled by the same Satanic cabal that has enslaved us for centuries.